X-Face avatars: decoding needs compface's tables (licence question) #166
Labels
No labels
area/ci
area/desktop
area/packaging
area/protocol
area/reading
area/ui
area/web
area/writing
kind/bug
kind/feature
kind/infra
kind/request
needs/user
parked
perf
security
upstream
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
littlefox/neokom#166
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Split out of #151 (profiles and avatars). Avatars there are coloured initials. Showing a person's X-Face (aux item 9, which elisp shows) needs a decoder, and that raises a licensing question.
Gen). The prediction step is driven by large fixed tables in compface'sgen.c.Options:
How common X-Faces are on kom.lysator.liu.se is unknown. Counting them needs a logged-in scan, which needs your OK (D-007).
We will do 1.
Decoding X-Face is not interesting, largely since the image is so low resolution and that the format is evidently heavily outdated since many years.
From what I can tell, X-Faces are not common at all, and the aux-item is largely vestigial.
Recorded as D-048 (PR #167). Profiles (#151) use coloured initials, and the X-Face aux item isn't decoded. Closing.